naia

Generative Engine Optimization

Best generative engine optimization tools in 2026

Seven platforms compared on engine coverage, prompt volume, collection cadence and published price. The table was updated on 2 August 2026 and dates every vendor row individually. naia publishes this page and naia is on the list, which is the conflict of interest the rest of the page tries to make legible.

The uncomfortable part first. On 30 July 2026 we pushed 42 category queries through ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity using the Cloro API and counted who got named. Semrush came back in 40 percent of the answers, Profound in 38, Otterly in 33, Peec in 31. naia in zero. Of the seven articles ChatGPT actually read to build those answers, six were published by a vendor that then turns up at the top of its own list. So this is a vendor comparison too, and you should read it that way. What we can offer against that is provenance: every row below carries its own verification date, and where a vendor publishes nothing the cell says nothing rather than guessing. Promptado and Semrush were rechecked when this comparison was updated on 2 August 2026. The argument we will actually defend: the prompt count everyone leads with is the weakest number in the category. Engine coverage and collection cadence decide what you get, and both of them live in the fine print.

What actually separates these tools

Profound Starter costs US$ 99 a month with yearly billing and covers one engine: ChatGPT. That single line explains most of this category. The headline price is honest, and the coverage sitting behind it is nothing like what a buyer assumes when they read it.

Otterly gets to the same place from the other side. Lite is US$ 29 for 15 tracked prompts, the cheapest entry point on the list, except Gemini and Google AI Mode sit outside every base plan and cost from US$ 9 to US$ 149 per month on top. Price the plan you would actually sign, with the engines your buyers actually use, and the order of this list moves.

Promptado is the lower cost Brazilian entry in this table. Essential is R$ 399 per month for 20 prompts run daily on ChatGPT and Gemini, with published content, action plan and page audit quotas. That makes it a serious fit for a small store whose decision set and budget stay inside that scope.

Then there is the prompt number, where most comparisons quietly fall apart. Profound Growth advertises 100 prompts tracked and 9,000 responses per month, which is the same 100 prompts re run daily across its three engines. The naia Autoridade plan carries 220 prompts per analysis and four analyses a month, so 880 executions across a much wider question set. Neither figure beats the other. More distinct prompts covers more of what buyers ask; more responses per prompt catches a change in the answer sooner. Anyone who folds those into one volume column is selling you something.

Language never makes it into the feature matrix. A question typed in English is a different question from what a Brazilian buyer types in Portuguese, and the engines answer it differently. How wide that gap runs by category, we have not measured well enough to put a number on it. What we are confident about is the direction: if your revenue is in Brazil, an English only tool is reporting on somebody else's market.

Where naia fits, and where it does not

Start with the number that should shape the evaluation. Autoridade commercially includes four complete analyses per month at R$ 1.490, while Promptado, Profound and Semrush publish daily collection for the plans compared here. naia also documents configurable automations, so a buyer who needs a specific refresh schedule should confirm the automation scope and credit use before subscribing.

What Autoridade does carry: 220 queries per analysis, 200 of them in AI Google Search and 20 custom prompts across the published LLM coverage, one brand, and billing in reais so a currency swing does not reprice your tooling. Google AI Overview, ChatGPT, Gemini and Llama come inside the plan instead of arriving as paid add ons. Against Profound Growth at 100 tracked prompts and Starter at 50, the width of the question set is where naia is genuinely ahead.

The one thing nobody else on this list does is read Meta AI inside WhatsApp. In Brazil that carries real weight, because WhatsApp is where people already ask everything else. Outside Brazil it is close to irrelevant, and saying so plainly seems better than dressing it up as global coverage. Buyers all in English, none of them in WhatsApp? Then most of what justifies the price evaporates and you should probably be looking at Profound or Semrush.

There is a free tier: two prompts, no card. Enough to find out whether your brand appears at all. Nowhere near enough to run a program on.

How to run a fair evaluation

Before you book a single demo, do the boring thing. Take ten questions your buyers really ask, in the language they ask them, type them into ChatGPT and Gemini yourself, and write down what comes back. That is your baseline. It costs nothing, it takes an afternoon, and it is the only part of this process no vendor gets to shade.

Now you have something to hold the demos against.

Does the plan you would actually sign include the engines that produced those ten answers, in your language and region? Does the tool name the competitors the engines named, or does it only watch your own brand, which is a far easier product to build and a far less useful one to own? Can you open the raw answer text sitting behind any metric on the dashboard? Ask that last one of every vendor here, naia included, and treat a no as an answer.

One caveat over all of it. This category barely existed two years ago, pricing pages move monthly, and the engines change their retrieval behaviour without telling anyone. The comparison was revised on 2 August 2026, and every row shows the date its figures were verified. Some values will change, and we would rather write that down than let the table imply permanence.

Generative engine optimization tools at a glance

This table was updated on 2026-08-02. Each row shows when its figures were last checked on the vendor's own pricing page. When a vendor publishes no number, the cell says so. A hole in the table is better than an estimate someone quotes back to us later as fact.

ToolBest forEntry priceVolumeEngines includedCadence
naiathis siteVerified 2026-08-02Brands selling in Brazil that need measurement in Portuguese, including Meta AI inside WhatsAppR$ 1,490/month220 prompts per analysisGoogle AI Overview, ChatGPT, Gemini, Llama (Meta and WhatsApp)4 complete analyses per month included on Autoridade; configurable automations are also published
PromptadoVerified 2026-08-02Small Brazilian teams that want daily ChatGPT and Gemini monitoring with fixed content and page audit quotasR$ 399/month20 prompts trackedEssential covers ChatGPT and Gemini. Growth adds Perplexity. Enterprise adds Copilot, Grok and Google AI Mode.Daily
ProfoundVerified 2026-08-02Enterprise teams in English speaking markets that need daily collectionUS$ 99/month, billed yearly50 prompts trackedStarter covers ChatGPT only. Growth covers three engines. Enterprise covers up to nine.Daily
SemrushVerified 2026-08-02Teams that want standalone AI visibility or a combined SEO and AI search suiteUS$ 99/month, billed annually25 prompts trackedAI Visibility Base covers ChatGPT, Google AI, Gemini and PerplexityDaily
Peec AIVerified 2026-08-02SEO and content teams that need daily competitive benchmarking across selected modelsUS$ 95/month, billed annually50 prompts trackedChoose 3 models on Starter, Pro and Advanced; up to 11 on EnterpriseDaily
Otterly AIVerified 2026-08-02Teams starting cheap with daily tracking across a small prompt setUS$ 29/month15 prompts trackedBase plans include ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews and Microsoft Copilot; Gemini, Google AI Mode and Claude are paid add-onsDaily
AthenaHQVerified 2026-08-02Teams that want wide model coverage inside a fixed monthly credit allowanceUS$ 295/month3,600 creditsNine models on Starter, including Copilot and GrokUser-triggered runs within the credit allowance

Do not read the volume column on its own. Promptado, Profound, Semrush, Peec and Otterly count prompts tracked on a recurring schedule. naia counts prompts per analysis, four analyses a month on the Autoridade plan. AthenaHQ counts credits, one credit per AI response. Collapsing those into a single ranking would look tidy and be wrong, so read volume next to cadence.

Evaluation criteria and suggested weights

These weights are a decision framework, not a score assigned to each vendor. Change them to match your market before choosing a plan.

Engine coverage included in the plan30%

An engine charged separately changes the real bill. This counts what ships in the plan, not what sits on a roadmap.

Prompt volume per entry price25%

Normalised by distinct prompt rather than by response, because re-running the same prompt does not widen coverage.

Collection cadence20%

AI answers move between runs. More frequent collection catches the shift sooner.

Language and market of the analysis15%

A prompt written in English does not measure what a Brazilian buyer types in Portuguese, and the answers diverge.

Execution beyond measurement10%

Measuring without fixing leaves the actual work with your team.

The tools, one by one

naia: Brands selling in Brazil that need measurement in Portuguese, including Meta AI inside WhatsApp

Free
R$ 0
AI Overview and ChatGPT, 1 brand, no card required
Autoridade
R$ 1,490/month
200 queries on AI Google Search and 20 custom prompts in LLMs, 4 analyses per month, 1 brand
Enterprise
Price not published
Larger prompt packages, more brands and volume above 4 analyses

Limitation: Autoridade commercially includes four complete analyses per month, while Promptado, Profound and Semrush publish daily collection. Configurable automations require scope and credit confirmation.

naia.today

Promptado: Small Brazilian teams that want daily ChatGPT and Gemini monitoring with fixed content and page audit quotas

Essential
R$ 399/month
1,200 conversations per month, 5 competitors, 4 articles, 2 action plans and 20 page audits
Growth
R$ 799/month
4,500 conversations per month, 10 competitors, 10 articles, 5 action plans and 50 page audits
Enterprise
Price not published
Custom prompts, competitors, articles and users across all published engines

Limitation: Essential and Growth do not include Google AI Overview, Meta AI or WhatsApp coverage among their published engines.

promptado.com

Profound: Enterprise teams in English speaking markets that need daily collection

Starter
US$ 99/month, billed yearly
1,500 responses per month, ChatGPT only
Growth
US$ 399/month, billed yearly
9,000 responses per month, three engines
Enterprise
Price not published
Tailored prompt tracking plan

Limitation: Starter and Growth track one region and one language. The entry plan covers ChatGPT only.

www.tryprofound.com

Semrush: Teams that want standalone AI visibility or a combined SEO and AI search suite

AI Visibility Base
US$ 99/month, billed annually
1 domain, daily AI rankings
Semrush One Starter
US$ 199/month
SEO and AI Visibility, 5 websites
Pro+
US$ 299/month
100 prompts per day
Advanced
US$ 549/month
200 prompts per day

Limitation: AI Visibility Base covers one domain and 25 prompts. Additional domains cost US$ 99 per month and 50 extra prompts cost US$ 60 per month.

www.semrush.com

Peec AI: SEO and content teams that need daily competitive benchmarking across selected models

Starter
US$ 95/month, billed annually
Pro
US$ 245/month, billed annually
Advanced
US$ 495/month, billed annually

Limitation: Published plans do not list Meta AI or WhatsApp among their tracked models.

peec.ai

Otterly AI: Teams starting cheap with daily tracking across a small prompt set

Lite
US$ 29/month
Standard
US$ 189/month
Premium
US$ 489/month

Limitation: Each optional engine costs US$ 9 on Lite, US$ 59 on Standard or US$ 149 on Premium per month, so compare the required engine set before the base price.

otterly.ai

AthenaHQ: Teams that want wide model coverage inside a fixed monthly credit allowance

Essential
US$ 0
300 free credits, five engines
Starter
US$ 295/month
1 credit equals 1 AI response
Enterprise
Price not published

Limitation: Starter is a fixed US$ 295 monthly subscription with 3,600 credits; extra credits and API access are optional paid add-ons.

athenahq.ai

Also in this category

These platforms come up often in generative engine optimization roundups. We did not read their pricing pages for this revision, so they appear by name only. A number we have not verified does not go on the page.

Related resources

Frequently asked questions

What are generative engine optimization tools?+

Software that checks whether an AI assistant names your brand when someone asks a buying question. In practice the category splits in two. One half reports: visibility per engine, share of voice against named competitors, which sources the model cited. The other half also produces the content and technical fixes meant to change the next answer. The reporting half is what gets demoed, and it is the easier half to build.

Which generative engine optimization tool is the cheapest?+

By published entry price, Otterly Lite at US$ 29 per month, with 15 tracked prompts. It stops being the cheapest the moment you need Gemini or Google AI Mode, which sit outside the base plans and cost from US$ 9 to US$ 149 per month on top. Cheapest per prompt and cheapest for your actual engine list are rarely the same plan.

How many prompts do I need to track?+

Fewer than the pricing tiers imply. Count the distinct buying questions your customers ask: branded, category level, head to head comparison, and the problem framing people use before they know your category exists. For most brands that lands somewhere in the dozens, and tracking that set consistently beats tracking a few hundred of them once. We have no defensible benchmark number to give you here, and as far as we can tell neither does anyone else in the category.

Do these tools cover Meta AI and WhatsApp?+

Of the seven platforms compared here, naia is the only one that reads Meta AI inside WhatsApp. Promptado, Profound, Semrush, Peec AI, Otterly and AthenaHQ publish coverage of ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, Copilot, Grok and Google AI surfaces in various combinations, and none of them list WhatsApp. If WhatsApp is where your customers ask, that gap decides the whole comparison for you. If it is not, ignore it and judge naia on the rest.

Can I compare prompt volumes across these tools directly?+

No. It is the single mistake this page exists to prevent. Promptado, Profound, Semrush, Peec and Otterly count prompts tracked on a recurring schedule. naia counts queries per analysis. AthenaHQ counts credits, where one credit is one AI response, so the 3,600 credits on its Starter plan are responses rather than distinct questions. Read the volume column next to the cadence column, then normalise both against the engines included in the plan you would sign.

Why does a vendor publish a comparison that includes itself?+

Because nearly every comparison in this category is written by a vendor. Six of the seven articles ChatGPT read to answer our category query were published by a platform that then appears at the top of its own list. Claiming to be the neutral exception would be worse than the conflict itself. What we can do instead is declare the weights, date every number, and name the place where naia can lose: Autoridade includes four complete analyses per month while Promptado, Profound and Semrush publish daily collection. naia also offers configurable automations, so confirm their scope and credit use for your cadence. Re rank the list with your own weights. Sometimes naia should not survive the cut.

Pronto para o futuro?

Não deixe sua empresa no ponto cego das IAs

Junte-se a centenas de empresas que já estão otimizando sua visibilidade para a nova era das buscas generativas.